Radiocarbon dating wrong

18-Oct-2017 13:46

And in the aftermath of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan, a nuclear crisis raised fears about radiation and questions about the safety of nuclear power.­Nuclear radiation can be both extremely beneficial and extremely dangerous. X-ray machines, some types of sterilization equipment and nuclear power plants all use nuclear radiation -- but so do nuclear weapons.As we pointed out in these two articles, radiometric dates are based on known rates of radioactivity, a phenomenon that is rooted in fundamental laws of physics and follows simple mathematical formulas.Dating schemes based on rates of radioactivity have been refined and scrutinized for several decades.We are told that these people spent 40 years wandering around in the desert — they escaped, as slaves from Egypt, and so forth.There is not a shred of archaeological or historical evidence, outside of the Bible, that this is even true! You would think that if a people spent 40 years wandering around in the desert they'd leave some archaeological evidence? There's no evidence that somebody named Moses even existed.In a related article on geologic ages (Ages), we presented a chart with the various geologic eras and their ages.

Archaeologists from the 19th century onward were actually surprised not to find any evidence whatsoever for the events of Exodus.The age of the fossil must be determined so it can be compared to other fossil species from the same time period.